It’s that time of year when you suddenly realize that any goals, plans, or New Year’s Resolutions you have for 2019 already seem like a bad idea. I certainly have. I’ve been sick, I’m in the midst of a significant professional transition, and I still can’t even find the notebook where in December 2018 I …
Putting things into categories is helpful. Sometimes it lets you recognize shared commonalities between things that you didn’t notice before. Other times it gives you a mental shortcut to know how to interact with something—once you know its category, you’re more likely to know what it’s for and what to do with it. In the …
In December I plan to post a series of log entries dedicated to the use of analogies. These posts will be true “log” items, in the sense that they will journal my progress as I try to create a “recipe” for applying analogical thinking in a research physics context, in order to generate insight and …
Marshmallows are exquisite probes of the human psyche. So, here’s a question: what relationship do marshmallows, tape, string, scientific discovery, and uncooked spaghetti all have in common? (And in case you’re wondering, this week’s feature photo is a bundle of uncooked spaghetti photographed from above.) The answer to the question above comes from answering another …
I love imagination. Ergo, I love thought experiments. I was also inspired to become a physicist by Einstein. Einstein was famous for his thought experiments. Ergo, I love thought experiments. My most recent thought experiment has been to try and flip on its head a way neutrino physicists have of making neutrinos sound as mystifying …
I have been letting ideas about practice, how to gain skill, how to gain mastery, and how to gain expertise percolate for some time now. Because what’s the point of learning a new skill, like scientific discovery, if you can’t practice it until you can do it well consistently? I’ve been very worried about this …
How do I model excellence? I’ve been reading some ideas on how to model the performance of successful people and wanted to translate this into scientific discovery and physics. If I want to model the physics discovery capabilities of one of the greats—Einstein, Newton, Noether, Fermi, Meitner, etc.—how exactly do I do that? My natural …
The balancing act between theory and practice, qualitative insight and quantitative assessment, is a tough one. In my quest to develop a repertoire of skills and practices targeted at scientific discovery, theory and qualitative insight have dominated the body of literature I’ve read so far. Until I came across a magnificent pair of papers published …
I once told a fellow graduate student at a nuclear physics summer school that, “I don’t speak math.” He found this very funny, and me very funny. But I absolutely meant it. In fact, I was angry about it. By that time, I had already met the sleep-depriving scientific discovery question I’ve dreamed of answering …
J. Hollingsworth’s article on institutional factors affecting scientific discovery and D. Coyle’s book discussing the role of coaching in the development of exceptional ability have me thinking about how connections with other people affect the discovery potential of the individual. In particular, they got me thinking about the Master-Apprentice model. Physics Ph.D. training essentially follows …